COPYRIGHT © 2009 ATAMIA

Login / Join

Michael McCormick

michael

michael

R18+ Australian Discussion Paper Released

Posted by: michael

Published: 2009-12-14

Should an R18+ classification be added for videogames? This is a question posed by the Australian government.

Interactive Games and Entertainment Association (IGEA) research indicates that adults are ”increasingly” consumers of videogames and independant research has shown the average age of gamers has grown. Companies recognise this and the content being produced for consumers is changing to meet audience demands.

In light of this, the Government of Australia have requested the public to make submissions on a Discussion Paper it has produced. This is the first time public opinion is being taken on board in relation to a topic of this nature.

The Discussion Paper lists the pros of adding an R18+ classification:

  • The R 18+ classification category sends a clear, unambiguous message to parents that the game material is unsuitable for minors.
  • Consistent classification categories for films and computer games are easier to understand.
  • A new classification will supplement technological controls on minors’ access to age inappropriate computer games.
  • Adults should not be prevented from playing R 18+ level computer games simply because they are unsuitable for minors.
  • Comparable international classification systems have an adult rating for computer games - international parity is desirable.
  • Consumers access games which would be R 18+ illegally – it would be better if they were legally available with appropriate restrictions.

And the cons:

  • Computer games should be treated differently from films given the specific, negative effects of interactivity on players, particularly their participation in violent and aggressive content.
  • It would be difficult for parents to enforce age restrictions for computer games.
  • Minors would be more likely to be exposed to computer games that are unsuitable for them.
  • An R 18+ for computer games would exacerbate problems associated with access to  high level material in Indigenous communities and by other non-English speaking people.
  • There is no demonstrated need to change existing restrictions.

 This PDF document explains how to make a submission and have your voice heard!

Bookmark and Share | Permalink | Top of page
Add comment

User comments [0]

Wish to comment on this article?

Then Sign up to Faceoffgames account.

Registration is painless and takes 1 minute. In addition to commenting on your articles you will also be able to

  • Win cash challenging friends and foes on your favourite games
  • Comment on any of our articles
  • See your comment and blog postings in our community section
  • Write your own blog
  • Make friends